For as long as I can
remember, the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church have been
constantly attacked, criticized, and even watered down (or attempted
to do so) by those that should know better. Although, it doesn't
surprise me to see these things, it is still a source of anguish to
see Christ attacked in such ways. One common objection to an
Apostolic teaching of the Church would be that of the Sacrament of
Penance or better known as Confession; the most common objection to
Confession is that it was 'created' by the Catholic Church and has no
basis in the roots of historical/biblical Christianity. Ironically,
this objection is primarily held by those who are often ignorant
(usually willfully ignorant) of both historical and biblical
Christianity! Let's help set the record straight by taking a look
into the Catholic Encyclopedia:
According to the Council of Trent, the consensus of all the Fathers always understood that by the words of Christ just cited, the power of forgiving and retaining sins was communicated to the Apostles and their lawful successors (Sess. XIV, c. i). It is therefore Catholic doctrine that the Church from the earliest times believed in the power to forgive sins as granted by Christ to the Apostles. Such a belief in fact was clearly inculcated by the words with which Christ granted the power, and it would have been inexplicable to the early Christians if any one who professed faith in Christ had questioned the existence of that power in the Church. But if, contrariwise, we suppose that no such belief existed from the beginning, we encounter a still greater difficulty: the first mention of that power would have been regarded as an innovation both needless and intolerable; it would have shown little practical wisdom on the part of those who were endeavoring to draw men to Christ; and it would have raised a protest or led to a schism which would certainly have gone on record as plainly at least as did early divisions on matters of less importance. But no such record is found; even those who sought to limit the power itself presupposed its existence, and their very attempt at limitation put them in opposition to the prevalent Catholic belief. Turning now to evidence of a positive sort, we have to note that the statements of any Father or orthodox ecclesiastical writer regarding penance present not merely his own personal view, but the commonly accepted belief; and furthermore that the belief which they record was no novelty at the time, but was the traditional doctrine handed down by the regular teaching of the Church and embodied in her practice. In other words, each witness speaks for a past that reaches back to the beginning, even when he does not expressly appeal to tradition.
St. Augustine (d. 430) warns the faithful: "Let us not listen to those who deny that the Church of God has power to forgive all sins" (De agon. Christ., iii).
These extracts show that the Fathers recognized in penance a
power and a utility quite distinct from that of baptism. Repeatedly
they compare in figurative language the two means of obtaining
pardon; or regarding baptism as spiritual birth, they describe
penance as the remedy for the ills of the soul contracted after that
birth. But a more important fact is that both in the West and in the
East, the Fathers constantly appeal to the words of Christ and given
them the same interpretation that was given eleven centuries later by
the Council of Trent. In this respect they simply echoed the
teachings of the earlier Fathers who had defended Catholic doctrine
against the heretics of the third and second centuries. Thus St.
Cyprian in his "De lapsis" (A.D. 251) rebukes those who had
fallen away in time of persecution, but he also exhorts them to
penance: "Let each confess his sin while he is still in this
world, while his confession can be received, while satisfaction and
the forgiveness granted by the priests is acceptable to God" (c.
xxix).
This website uses Cookies. By continuing to use our site, you consent to the use of cookies.